Key Points about the Ape Canyon Bigfoot Incident

  • In 1924, miners near Mount St. Helens said that “ape-men” attacked their cabin. This story became a big part of Bigfoot lore.

  • The miners said they saw big footprints, shot at a monster that looked like an ape, and had to endure a night-long siege in which creatures threw rocks at them and tried to escape into their cabin.

  • Indigenous tribes in the area have long-standing stories of wild, hairy mountain men with names like “Skoocoom” or “Stiyaha.” These stories impacted the way Bigfoot mythology changed throughout time.

  • It looks like the event was part of a local hoaxing tradition, since a group named the “St. Helens Apes” was known to construct wooden feet to leave traces in the same region.

  • The myth of Ape Canyon helped make the Pacific Northwest Bigfoot’s main home in popular culture and became a key source of information for later Bigfoot researchers.

  • The Ape Canyon incident shows how much Americans are still interested in the unknown, whether it was a real encounter, a case of mistaken identity, or a fake. Each generation interprets it in a different way.

By Caroline - originally posted to Flickr as Ape Shit, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=4631854
View of Ape Canyon

Introduction

In the summer of 1924, a secluded canyon in Washington State became the site of one of the most renowned events in American cryptozoology. People called the event “The Ape Canyon Incident.” “Ape-men” attacked a group of miners who were staying in their cabin near Mount St. Helens. This episode would become a key part of Bigfoot lore, making the legend of the strange monster more well-known in the United States and making the Pacific Northwest the center of Sasquatch activity. The Ape Canyon episode is still captivating to both believers and skeptics almost 100 years later. It was a key event in the development of one of America’s most lasting folk traditions.

Overview

The event that happened at Ape Canyon started when a prospector called Fred Beck and four friends were looking for gold near Mount St. Helens. The guys said that in the days leading up to the incident, they had seen big footprints about their camp. Beck even said that he had shot at a big, ape-like figure that he saw standing on a ridge. That night, the miners’ hut was supposedly attacked, with enormous rocks being thrown at the walls and big, hairy people trying to get in via the door and windows. The frightened men reportedly spent the night firing at the intruders, claiming to have hit at least one beast. When the sun came up, the attack stopped, and the miners were able to leave the area and tell their terrifying story (Coleman, 2009).

In 1924, Ape Canyon was a desolate, rough ravine cut into the southeastern slope of Mount St. Helens. It was covered in old forests of tall Douglas fir, western hemlock, and cedar trees that produced deep shadows on the forest floor. The canyon’s high sides dropped precipitously to a creek below, making it a remote wilderness that few people went into except for tenacious prospectors, trappers, and the occasional adventurer looking for timber or mineral fortune. Getting to the location was quite difficult. Travelers had to follow rough tracks that often disappeared into thick vegetation, climb steep hills, and cross cold mountain streams without bridges or regular paths. The area experienced harsh winters characterized by heavy snowfall and fog that frequently obscured the slope. Summers were much milder, which drew huckleberry pickers to the many berry patches in neighboring clearings. This scary region, with its deep, dark depths, spooky silences interrupted only by the sounds of nature, and often poor visibility, was the perfect place for stories of odd creatures hiding in the shadows, whether they were genuine or made up (Evarts, 2002).

Long before the 1924 event that made the Ape Canyon area famous, it was full of Native American stories. The Klickitat and Yakama were two Native American tribes that lived in the area. They had stories about savage, hairy men that lived in the mountains and would sometimes take women or children. People called these beings by several names, such as “Skoocoom” or “Stiyaha.” They were usually portrayed as powerful, hard-to-find woodland inhabitants whom people should stay away from. The tribes were both afraid of and respectful of these beings, which they thought were spiritual beings rather than animals. When settlers came to the area, they started to talk about their encounters with strange two-legged creatures. These settlers gradually incorporated elements of these indigenous beliefs into the expanding Bigfoot mythology that would eventually be referred to as the Pacific Northwest.

Ape Canyon incident
Ape Canyon incident

Hoax?

Even though the miners’ claims were very dramatic, there is strong evidence that the Ape Canyon episode was part of a long history of hoaxes in the area. The story of Bigfoot in the Toledo, Washington area started as “a lighthearted joke among loggers in the 1930s” to terrify people who were picking huckleberries. A gang called the “St. Helens Apes,” including local resident Rant Mullins, was known for manufacturing immense wooden feet to leave tracks in snow and pumice near Mount St. Helens, where the Ape Canyon incident occurred. These pranks became well-known in the area, with tracks put in places where hikers and travelers would discover them. These same pranksters allegedly funded a scout group that named the “Ape Caves” lava tube in Gifford Pinchot National Forest. Ray Wallace, another Toledo native, would later continue this history of hoaxes. His 1958 California prank about wooden feet led to the name “Bigfoot,” which suggests that practical jokes about unknown forest animals may have been going on in the area for a long time (Mittge, 2007).

The tale traveled quickly through newspapers across the country just after the Ape Canyon event. At first, many people were interested in Beck’s story instead of just ignoring it. This was because the Cascades were still full of mysteries in the early 1900s. Fred Beck would subsequently write a pamphlet about what happened to him, and he would always say that it happened precisely the way he said it did. Skeptics, on the other hand, have put forward a number of other possible explanations, such as a prank conducted by campers nearby, hallucinations caused by being alone, or even a mistake in identifying known fauna. Some say the miners were looking for gold, which they think is why they made up the story to scare off land claimants (Korté, 2022).

Impact

The Ape Canyon incident significantly influenced Bigfoot lore, a legacy that continues to this day. The occurrence happened before the word “Bigfoot” was even used. It didn’t become part of American English until the late 1950s, when footprints were found in northern California and became very famous. Many books, documentaries, and TV shows about Sasquatch have recounted the Ape Canyon narrative. This narrative has helped make the Pacific Northwest the creature’s most famous home in popular culture. The place itself became a pilgrimage site for Bigfoot fans until the eruption of Mount St. Helens in 1980 changed the terrain in a big way. Researchers still go to the same general location from time to time in the hopes of finding proof that Beck’s tale from a hundred years ago is true or of documenting new encounters.

The Ape Canyon event has generated significant scientific interest in the Bigfoot phenomenon. Anthropologists and zoologists started to look into Sasquatch tales more systematically in the years after the event. They applied scientific methods to what was previously considered mere mythology. The Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization and other groups now keep large databases of sightings. The Ape Canyon tale is one of the historical references they use (Green, 1967). Mainstream science still doubts that there is an undiscovered primate in North America, but the Bigfoot phenomenon has sparked serious conversations about how eyewitness testimony works, what folklore means in modern society, and how indigenous knowledge and Western scientific traditions interact with each other.

Conclusion

The Ape Canyon event shows how much Americans are still interested in things that are strange and mysterious. Whether people perceive the events of that July night in 1924 as a genuine encounter with a new species, a case of misidentification, or a fabricated narrative that captured the public’s interest, they have left an enduring mark on American folklore. The story changes over time as each new generation sees it through the lens of their culture, science, and connection to the natural world. The deep forests of the Pacific Northwest will always have an air of mystery and wilderness. Ape Canyon will always be a fascinating part of the Bigfoot story, making us wonder what else might be hiding in the shadows of our rapidly disappearing wild places.

References

Coleman, L. (2009). Bigfoot!: The True Story of Apes in America. Simon and Schuster.

Evarts, R. C. (2002). Geologic map of the Deer Island Quadrangle, Columbia County, Oregon and Cowlitz County, Washington. The Survey.

Green, J. W. (1967). Reports indicating the existence of giants, human-like creatures, in North America and comment thereon. Genus, 221-245.

Korté, S. (2022). What Do We Know About Bigfoot?. Penguin.

Mittge, B. (2007, April 11). Toledo retiree admits Bigfoot hoax in 1982. The Daily Chronicle. https://www.chronline.com/stories/toledo-retiree-admits-bigfoot-hoax-in-1982,212478

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Connect Paranormal Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading