Demon-Worshipping Cults: Key Points
- Demons have appeared in religious traditions for thousands of years, ranging from dangerous spirits in Mesopotamia to fallen angels associated with Satan in Christianity.
- Ancient religions sometimes honored or invoked supernatural beings later classified as demons, although their followers did not necessarily consider these beings evil.
- Medieval Europe experienced widespread accusations of demon worship, particularly against witches, heretics, and the Knights Templar, despite little reliable evidence of organized satanic cults.
- Modern demon-worshipping groups include some forms of theistic Satanism and demonolatry, whose followers may view demons as spiritual guides, sources of power, or symbols of rebellion.
- Theories explaining demon worship include resistance to religious authority, the pursuit of forbidden knowledge, psychological exploration, and the desire for belonging within unconventional religious communities.
- Fear of demon-worshipping cults contributed to witch trials, religious persecution, and the satanic panic of the 1980s, illustrating how supernatural beliefs and conspiracy theories can produce serious social consequences.
Introduction
Throughout history, human societies have imagined supernatural beings capable of causing illness, tempting individuals into wrongdoing, manipulating natural events, and challenging the authority of the gods. These beings, commonly called demons, have occupied a troubling position between religion, folklore, and the supernatural. Although demons are generally portrayed as enemies of humanity, some religious traditions have attempted to communicate with them, command their powers, or incorporate them into spiritual practices. The idea of organized groups deliberately worshipping demons has inspired centuries of accusations, persecution, sensational literature, and popular entertainment. Yet the historical reality is considerably more complicated. Some individuals and small religious movements have embraced figures traditionally identified as demonic, while many alleged demon-worshipping cults existed primarily in the imaginations of their accusers. Understanding these groups requires examining the history of demons, the development of religious cults, the relationship between magic and worship, and the social fears that have shaped accusations of demonic activity. The resulting history reveals as much about human attitudes toward religious authority and forbidden knowledge as it does about belief in supernatural evil.
In many discussions of witchcraft, sorcery, and demonology, practitioners are portrayed as acting in league with evil spirits or demons, and sometimes as demon-worshippers or servants of the devil (e.g., discussions of witchcraft and its demonological framing). This framing is explicit in historical overviews of witchcraft’s demonological components (Bailey, n.d.) and is echoed in broader examinations of how “demon-worship” is invoked in medieval and early modern European contexts (Bailey, 2006; , Champion, 2011). These claims are often contrasted with modern, critical analyses of how such depictions were constructed rather than empirically proven facts about individuals’ beliefs (Scott, 1992; Spaños, 1978). The claim “the practitioners of such magic have often been regarded as being in league with evil spirits or demons” is stated in Bailey’s overview of Witchcraft and Sorcery and Sorcery concepts (Bailey, n.d.) and likewise appears in Bailey’s broader discussions of witchcraft and demonology (Bailey, 2006).
Origins and Changing Conceptions of Demons
The word “demon” comes from the ancient Greek daimōn, a term that originally referred to a divine or supernatural power rather than an inherently evil being. In ancient Greek religion and philosophy, daimones could influence human affairs, communicate divine intentions, or occupy an intermediate position between mortals and the gods. Plato described such intermediary spirits in the Symposium, where they helped bridge the separation between humanity and the divine (Plato, 1997). The philosopher Socrates famously referred to a personal divine sign that warned him against certain actions. Such experiences were not necessarily understood as encounters with malicious supernatural beings. The modern Western conception of demons as fundamentally evil developed through a lengthy process of religious reinterpretation, particularly within Jewish and Christian traditions.
Ancient Mesopotamian civilizations possessed elaborate beliefs about supernatural beings that threatened human health and security. Akkadian texts describe dangerous spirits associated with disease, misfortune, and attacks upon vulnerable individuals. Lamashtu, a terrifying female supernatural figure, was especially feared for threatening pregnant women and infants. Pazuzu, another frightening being, could paradoxically serve as a protector against Lamashtu despite possessing dangerous characteristics of his own. Mesopotamian priests and ritual specialists employed incantations, protective objects, and elaborate ceremonies to defend households against supernatural threats. These practices demonstrate that relationships with dangerous spirits were not always based on simple opposition. A threatening supernatural power might also be invoked to protect people from something considered even more dangerous (Black & Green, 1992).
Ancient Egyptian religion likewise recognized numerous supernatural beings that modern observers might classify as demons. Some guarded entrances to the afterlife, punished enemies of the gods, or threatened travelers passing through dangerous spiritual regions. Others could serve protective purposes when properly approached through religious rituals. Egyptian supernatural beings were not organized into a single category equivalent to the Christian concept of demons. Their moral character often depended upon their responsibilities, relationships, and the circumstances of an encounter. Protective deities such as Bes possessed frightening physical appearances while defending households, childbirth, and children. This combination of threatening imagery and beneficial behavior illustrates how misleading it can be to apply later Christian classifications to ancient religious systems (Pinch, 2002).
Jewish religious literature gradually developed more elaborate accounts of hostile supernatural beings. The Hebrew Bible contains references to troubling spirits, supernatural adversaries, and beings associated with forbidden religious practices. Later Jewish writings expanded these ideas considerably. The Book of Enoch, particularly its account of the Watchers, describes heavenly beings who descended to Earth, entered forbidden relationships with human women, and contributed to the corruption of humanity. Their offspring, the giants, became associated with the origins of evil spirits in subsequent interpretations. Such traditions influenced the developing demonology of early Judaism and Christianity, although the precise relationships among fallen angels, evil spirits, and Satan varied across texts and communities (Reed, 2005).
Christianity increasingly associated demons with Satan and the rebellion of fallen angels against God. The New Testament presents demons as spiritual forces capable of possessing individuals, producing suffering, and opposing the ministry of Jesus. Exorcism became an important demonstration of divine authority, since the expulsion of demons represented the triumph of God’s power over evil. Christian theologians subsequently developed more elaborate explanations of demonic hierarchies, temptation, possession, and spiritual warfare. Augustine argued that pagan gods were actually deceptive spirits seeking religious devotion that properly belonged to God. This interpretation had lasting consequences. Religious practices outside Christianity could be understood as forms of demon worship even when their participants had entirely different explanations for their beliefs (Augustine, 1998).
Islamic traditions provide another important perspective through their accounts of jinn and the figure of Iblis. The Quran describes jinn as beings created from fire, possessing moral responsibility and the ability to choose between belief and unbelief. Unlike the predominantly evil demons of later Christian theology, jinn are not necessarily hostile to humanity. Some are righteous, while others are rebellious or dangerous. Iblis, who refuses God’s command to bow before Adam, becomes a central figure in Islamic discussions of temptation and disobedience. The relationship between jinn, devils, and demonic activity has generated an extensive body of theology and folklore. However, belief in jinn should not be confused with worshipping demons, since Islamic teachings generally condemn directing worship toward supernatural beings apart from God (El-Zein, 2009).
Historical Accusations, Witchcraft, and Ceremonial Magic
The term cult introduces additional difficulties. In the academic study of religion, a cult can refer to an organized system of worship or ritual devotion associated with a particular deity, sacred figure, or religious institution. Historians routinely discuss the cult of Isis, the cult of Mithras, and the imperial cult of ancient Rome without suggesting that these traditions were necessarily abusive or sinister. In modern popular language, however, the word frequently describes small religious movements characterized by unusual beliefs, intense devotion to leaders, secrecy, or alleged manipulation. Sociologists of religion often prefer terms such as “new religious movement” because the popular meaning of “cult” carries assumptions that may interfere with objective analysis (Barker, 1984).
A demon-worshipping cult might therefore be defined as an organized group that deliberately venerates supernatural beings understood by its members as demons. This definition immediately separates actual religious practices from accusations made by outsiders. A group that is said to worship demons may actually worship traditional gods, do ceremonial magic, follow a different version of Christianity, or not believe in any religion at all. The distinction matters because accusations of demon worship have historically justified discrimination, imprisonment, torture, and execution. Identifying a genuine demon-worshipping movement requires evidence of what its participants actually believed and practiced, preferably from their writings, testimony, and ritual materials.
Witchcraft and demonological discourse frequently ascribe specific ritual acts to demon worship, including desecration of sacred objects, flight or nocturnal gatherings, and sexual or fertility-related rites attached to demonic figures. These motifs are described as part of the “demon-worship” package in historical overviews of witchcraft and the witch-sabbath, with particular emphasis on the ritualized transgression of Christian symbols (e.g., trampling the cross, desecrating the Eucharist) and “mortuary rituals” or ritual meals in some accounts (Bailey, 2006; , Champion, 2011; Benga, 2023). Some sources emphasize the sensationalized ritual tableaux that entered popular and scholarly discourse, especially in the context of witch-panic literature (Benga, 2023).
The ancient Mediterranean world offers numerous examples of religious practices that later Christian writers condemned as demonic. Mystery religions devoted to Isis, Mithras, Dionysus, and other divine figures sometimes employed initiation ceremonies, restricted religious knowledge, and distinctive ritual practices. Their secrecy encouraged suspicion among outsiders, particularly when competing religious communities sought to portray them as dangerous. Nevertheless, these movements generally devoted themselves to recognized gods within their respective religious traditions. Labeling them demon cults imposes an interpretation that their practitioners would not have accepted. The association between unfamiliar religious ceremonies and demonic worship became especially powerful as Christianity gained political and cultural authority throughout the Roman Empire (Augustine, 1998).
Medieval Europe produced increasingly elaborate accounts of secret groups supposedly devoted to Satan. Religious leaders have said that heretical groups take part in sexual misconduct, obscene rituals, and worship of demons. Similar accusations appeared against different communities despite substantial differences in their actual beliefs. One notorious example involved the Knights Templar, whose members were arrested beginning in 1307 under orders from King Philip IV of France. Among the charges were accusations of denying Christ, spitting upon the cross, and venerating a mysterious idol sometimes identified as Baphomet. Many confessions were extracted under torture, and historians have found no convincing evidence that the Templars maintained an organized system of demon worship. Their prosecution illustrates how accusations of forbidden religious practices could support political and financial objectives (Barber, 1994).
The European witch trials further strengthened the popular association between secret gatherings and demon worship. From the fifteenth through the seventeenth centuries, demonological writers described witches as members of an organized conspiracy directed by Satan. According to these accounts, witches attended nocturnal assemblies known as sabbaths, renounced Christianity, entered into pacts with the Devil, and received supernatural powers in exchange for obedience. Some narratives described ritual feasts, sexual encounters with demons, and the desecration of Christian symbols. These images became so influential that they shaped courtroom questioning, popular literature, and the testimony of accused individuals. Yet modern historical scholarship generally treats the supposed continent-wide satanic conspiracy as a construction of persecution rather than a documented underground religion (Levack, 2016).
The witch trials also demonstrate the dangers of treating confessions as straightforward historical evidence. Accused individuals frequently faced torture, threats, prolonged imprisonment, and interrogations structured around expectations drawn from demonological literature. Under these circumstances, confessions could reproduce the stories investigators wanted to hear. Some accused witches may have practiced folk magic, healing, divination, or traditional religious customs, but these activities did not establish membership in a secret satanic organization. Scholars have also questioned earlier attempts to interpret European witchcraft as the surviving religion of a prehistoric fertility cult. Although the idea became influential in modern Pagan movements, the historical evidence does not support the existence of a unified ancient witch religion secretly preserved throughout medieval Europe (Hutton, 1999).
The emergence of ceremonial magic created another connection between demons and organized occult activity. Medieval and early modern grimoires, or books of magical instructions, described methods for summoning spirits, obtaining hidden knowledge, locating treasure, influencing other people, and commanding supernatural forces. The Lesser Key of Solomon, particularly the section commonly known as the Ars Goetia, became famous for listing seventy-two spirits along with their titles, abilities, and symbolic seals. Some spirits were described as kings, dukes, princes, or presidents within an elaborate supernatural hierarchy. Ritual instructions frequently required protective circles, divine names, and commands intended to compel obedience. Such practices were controversial because they involved contact with beings considered dangerous or forbidden. However, summoning a demon was not necessarily equivalent to worshipping it. Many ceremonial magicians believed they were exercising authority over spirits through the power of God, an important distinction between magical coercion and religious devotion (Davies, 2009).
The nineteenth century witnessed renewed interest in occultism, spiritualism, and esoteric religious traditions. Secret societies and magical orders experimented with ritual symbolism, mystical interpretations of Christianity, Hermetic philosophy, and ceremonial practices drawn from older grimoires. The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, founded in Britain in 1888, became particularly influential in the development of modern Western ceremonial magic. Its members studied astrology, alchemy, tarot, Kabbalah, and ritual techniques intended to produce spiritual transformation. Although popular accounts sometimes associated such organizations with satanic activity, their teachings were considerably more varied. Their rituals generally focused on spiritual knowledge and symbolic systems rather than the worship of demons. Nevertheless, the revival of ceremonial magic helped create the cultural environment in which explicitly satanic religious identities would later emerge (Asprem, 2014).
Modern Satanism and Demonolatry
Modern Satanism developed into several distinct movements, and it is important to distinguish their beliefs. Anton Szandor LaVey founded the Church of Satan in San Francisco in 1966 and published The Satanic Bible in 1969. LaVeyan Satanism generally interprets Satan as a symbol of individualism, self-interest, rebellion, and opposition to conventional religious morality. Its philosophy does not require belief in a literal supernatural Devil. Rituals can serve psychological, theatrical, or symbolic purposes rather than attempts to communicate with an actual demonic being. Consequently, describing the Church of Satan as a demon-worshipping cult would misrepresent its central teachings, even though its deliberate use of satanic imagery has contributed to public misunderstanding (Introvigne, 2016).
Other Satanists have adopted theistic interpretations in which Satan, Lucifer, or related supernatural figures are understood as real spiritual beings. Some regard Satan as a liberator, a source of forbidden knowledge, or an opponent of an oppressive divine authority. Others incorporate demons from ceremonial grimoires into personal devotional practices, treating particular spirits as teachers, protectors, or objects of reverence. These approaches are often described as theistic Satanism, demonolatry, or demon worship, although the terms are not interchangeable in every community. Demonolatry specifically emphasizes religious relationships with demons, sometimes including offerings, meditation, invocations, and devotional ceremonies. Such practices may be conducted by solitary practitioners or small groups without a centralized religious authority. The diversity of these traditions makes sweeping claims about their beliefs or behavior unreliable (Faxneld & Petersen, 2013).
One historical example of an explicitly demonic religious identity emerged through the Order of Nine Angles, a British-origin extremist occult movement associated with a distinctive interpretation of Satanism. Its writings combined esoteric symbolism, transgressive practices, and extremist political ideas. Researchers have documented the movement’s connections to neo-Nazi ideology and its promotion of radicalization through occult frameworks. Unlike the largely symbolic Satanism associated with LaVey, the Order of Nine Angles developed a worldview that could encourage dangerous forms of extremism. However, its history should not be treated as representative of Satanists generally. Religious movements that use similar supernatural imagery can possess radically different moral teachings, organizational structures, and relationships with violence (Goodrick-Clarke, 2002).
Modern demonolatry also reflects the growing influence of the internet upon religious experimentation. Online communities allow individuals to exchange interpretations of ancient grimoires, discuss experiences attributed to supernatural beings, and construct rituals from multiple historical traditions. Some practitioners interpret demons as independent spiritual intelligences, while others understand them as psychological archetypes or manifestations of personal consciousness. The names Lucifer, Lilith, Asmodeus, Belial, and Astaroth appear frequently in modern occult discussions, although these figures have distinct histories that cannot be reduced to a single religious system. Their incorporation into contemporary devotional practices represents a process of reinterpretation in which ancient religious and literary figures acquire new meanings. Internet-based communities can strengthen these identities even when participants never meet in person (Asprem, 2014; Faxneld & Petersen, 2013).
Motivations, Moral Panics, and Cultural Impact
The question of why individuals might deliberately worship beings traditionally portrayed as evil has attracted several competing explanations. One approach emphasizes religious rebellion. People raised within traditions that condemn Satan may reinterpret him as a symbol of resistance against religious authority, restrictive morality, or established social expectations. Such individuals may regard the Devil as a misunderstood figure whose negative reputation reflects the perspective of his opponents. Romantic literature contributed to this reinterpretation by portraying Satan as a tragic rebel or defiant individual. Nineteenth-century literary and artistic traditions helped transform Satan from an exclusively terrifying supernatural enemy into a figure capable of representing freedom, intellectual independence, and resistance to authority (Faxneld, 2017).
A second explanation concerns the pursuit of forbidden knowledge and supernatural power. Within many occult traditions, demons are imagined as possessing information unavailable to ordinary human beings. They may supposedly reveal hidden treasures, explain mysterious events, provide assistance in love or business, or teach specialized forms of magic. A person who believes such beings exist might attempt to establish a relationship with them for practical benefits. The attraction is understandable within the internal logic of magical belief. If supernatural entities possess knowledge or abilities beyond human limitations, communication with them might appear to offer extraordinary opportunities. Historical grimoires frequently reflect this instrumental approach, presenting spirits as sources of specific services rather than objects of unconditional religious devotion (Davies, 2009).
Psychological interpretations offer another perspective. Religious rituals involving frightening symbols, darkness, secrecy, and supernatural imagery may create powerful emotional experiences. Participants can interpret these experiences as encounters with external spiritual beings, expressions of unconscious mental processes, or transformations of personal identity. Carl Jung’s theory of archetypes has influenced some modern occult interpretations, particularly the idea that frightening supernatural figures can represent disowned or suppressed aspects of the personality. In this framework, confronting a demon symbolically might become a method of examining fear, aggression, desire, or other difficult emotions. Such psychological interpretations do not establish whether supernatural beings exist, but they help explain why demonic imagery can remain meaningful even among practitioners who reject literal belief in demons (Jung, 1968).
Sociological theories focus on the relationship between unconventional religious movements and the societies surrounding them. Groups that adopt forbidden symbols may develop strong internal identities precisely because outsiders condemn their beliefs. Shared secrecy, unusual rituals, and experiences of social rejection can strengthen group solidarity. Membership may provide friendship, recognition, a sense of belonging, and an explanation for personal difficulties. Yet these characteristics are not unique to demon-oriented religions. Similar processes occur within many minority religious communities and secular organizations. The presence of secrecy or unconventional symbolism does not automatically establish manipulation, abuse, or criminal activity. Sociological analysis must examine actual organizational practices rather than assume that unfamiliar beliefs produce dangerous behavior (Barker, 1984).
The most sensational accounts of demon-worshipping cults have often emerged during periods of widespread social anxiety. The satanic panic of the 1980s and early 1990s provides a particularly important example. Across the United States and other countries, allegations circulated that secret satanic organizations were conducting ritual murders, sexually abusing children, and operating hidden networks within schools, daycare centers, and communities. Some investigators, therapists, religious activists, and media personalities promoted claims of elaborate underground conspiracies. Accusations sometimes depended upon suggestive interviews, controversial recovered-memory techniques, and interpretations of ordinary events as evidence of occult activity. Extensive investigations failed to substantiate the existence of the vast, coordinated satanic networks described in these narratives (Victor, 1993).
The consequences were severe. Families faced public suspicion, individuals were prosecuted, and some children experienced repeated questioning that could contaminate their recollections. The McMartin Preschool case in California became one of the most notorious examples. Beginning in 1983, allegations against daycare employees expanded into extraordinary claims involving secret tunnels, ritual ceremonies, and organized abuse. The resulting legal proceedings continued for years without producing convictions. The case demonstrated how investigative errors, public fear, and institutional pressure could combine to produce an enduring belief in a hidden satanic conspiracy despite the absence of reliable supporting evidence. Researchers studying the panic have emphasized the importance of distinguishing genuine criminal abuse from unsupported claims that supernatural rituals formed part of a nationwide conspiracy (Nathan & Snedeker, 1995).
Demon-worship accusations have been central to the social and political machinery of persecution in early modern Europe. The demon-worship frame contributed to the characterization of accused individuals (often women, social outcasts) as agents of evil and agents of Satan, which in turn justified inquisitorial action and public condemnation (Bailey, 2006; , Bailey, n.d.; , Scott, 1992; , Spaños, 1978). The literature highlights that these associations were often part of broader depictions of “witches” as enemies of the Christian order, rather than neutral reports of belief or practice (Bailey, n.d.; , Spaños, 1978).
The satanic panic also revived older patterns of accusation. Medieval witch trials, heresy prosecutions, and modern ritual-abuse allegations share recurring themes: secret gatherings, sexual transgression, attacks upon children, desecration of sacred objects, and conspiracies supposedly threatening the moral foundations of society. These similarities suggest that stories about demon-worshipping cults often function as expressions of collective fear. During periods of rapid cultural change, the image of a hidden evil organization can provide a simple explanation for complicated social problems. The alleged cult becomes a convenient enemy onto which anxieties about religion, sexuality, family stability, and social authority can be projected. This interpretation does not mean that every allegation involving an occult group is false. It means that extraordinary accusations require evidence independent of the fears that generated them (Victor, 1993).
Popular entertainment has contributed heavily to the modern image of demon worship. Horror films, novels, television programs, and video games frequently depict secret organizations sacrificing victims, opening portals to supernatural dimensions, and summoning destructive entities. These stories draw upon Christian demonology, medieval grimoires, witch-trial literature, and modern conspiracy theories. The resulting fictional cult often possesses an elaborate hierarchy, mysterious symbols, ancient scriptures, and an obsession with apocalyptic destruction. Such imagery can be effective storytelling, but it rarely represents the ordinary practices of contemporary occult communities. The boundary between entertainment and belief sometimes becomes blurred when fictional symbols are interpreted as evidence of actual conspiracies or when modern practitioners adopt imagery originally popularized through fiction.
The relationship between demon worship and criminal behavior deserves careful examination. Individuals who identify with Satan or demons have occasionally committed violent crimes, and some extremist movements have incorporated occult imagery into ideologies that glorify cruelty. However, criminal acts must be established through ordinary evidence, including forensic findings, credible testimony, and documented actions. Religious symbolism alone cannot demonstrate motive, organizational membership, or guilt. Equally important, the existence of an individual offender who claims satanic inspiration does not establish the presence of a larger demon-worshipping conspiracy. Historical experience shows that failing to maintain these distinctions can lead to wrongful accusations and distorted criminal investigations (Nathan & Snedeker, 1995; Victor, 1993).
The cultural impact of demon-worshipping cults extends well beyond religious history. Accusations of demonic activity have influenced legal institutions, political conflicts, religious persecution, and public attitudes toward minority communities. The fear of secret satanic organizations has repeatedly encouraged authorities to investigate unpopular groups and reinterpret unfamiliar customs as evidence of supernatural evil. At the same time, demonic imagery has inspired literature, visual art, music, and religious experimentation. Some modern occult practitioners deliberately reclaim figures condemned by traditional religions, transforming symbols of evil into representations of personal freedom or spiritual discovery. These competing interpretations demonstrate how the meaning of a demon depends heavily upon the religious and cultural perspective of the observer.
The study of demon-worshipping cults also raises questions about the preservation of historical evidence. Accounts written by persecutors often survive more readily than the voices of the accused, creating a distorted documentary record. Medieval inquisitorial proceedings, witch-trial confessions, sensational newspaper stories, and modern internet rumors may describe elaborate demonic organizations without providing independent confirmation that such organizations existed. Historians must therefore distinguish firsthand religious documents from hostile accusations, coerced testimony, fictional narratives, and later reinterpretations. This challenge becomes especially important when investigating modern online communities, where anonymous claims, fabricated rituals, and rapidly circulating legends can make it difficult to determine whether an alleged group represents an actual organization, a small collection of believers, or an invented mythology.
Demon-worshipping cults occupy an unusual position in the history of religion because their popular reputation is far larger than the documented history of organized demon worship itself. Ancient civilizations recognized dangerous supernatural beings, medieval magicians attempted to command spirits, and some modern religious practitioners have deliberately embraced demons as objects of devotion. Yet many of the most notorious supposed demon cults, including the satanic conspiracies described during the European witch trials and the modern satanic panic, were products of accusation, fear, and unreliable evidence. Theories involving religious rebellion, forbidden knowledge, psychological symbolism, and group identity help explain why demonic figures continue to attract interest. Their cultural influence remains substantial, particularly in horror entertainment, occult spirituality, and conspiracy narratives. Perhaps the most revealing lesson is that societies have often been more willing to believe in hidden demon-worshipping organizations than to investigate whether those organizations actually exist. Studying this history requires taking religious beliefs seriously while maintaining a firm distinction between documented practices, supernatural claims, and the enduring human tendency to imagine evil operating secretly within society.
References
Asprem, E. (2014). The problem of disenchantment: Scientific naturalism and esoteric discourse, 1900–1939. Brill.
Augustine. (1998). The city of God against the pagans (R. W. Dyson, Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Bailey, M. D. (2006). The meanings of magic. Magic, Ritual, and Witchcraft, 1(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1353/mrw.0.0052
Bailey, M. D. (n.d.). Witch / witchcraft and sorcerer / sorcery. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004249707_vsr_com_00000521
Barber, M. (1994). The new knighthood: A history of the Order of the Temple. Cambridge University Press.
Barker, E. (1984). The making of a Moonie: Choice or brainwashing? Basil Blackwell.
Benga, I. (2023). Emma Wilby. 2019. Invoking the Akelarre. Voices of the accused in the Basque witch-craze, 1609–1614. Brighton, Chicago, Toronto: Sussex Academic Press, 480 p. Martor: The Museum of the Romanian Peasant Anthropology Review, 28, 224–230. https://doi.org/10.57225/martor.2023.28.15
Black, J., & Green, A. (1992). Gods, demons and symbols of ancient Mesopotamia: An illustrated dictionary. British Museum Press.
Champion, M. S. (2011). Crushing the canon: Nicolas Jacquier’s response to the Canon Episcopi in the Flagellum haereticorum fascinariorum. Magic, Ritual, and Witchcraft, 6(2), 183–211. https://doi.org/10.1353/mrw.2011.0022
Davies, O. (2009). Grimoires: A history of magic books. Oxford University Press.
El-Zein, A. (2009). Islam, Arabs, and the intelligent world of the jinn. Syracuse University Press.
Faxneld, P. (2017). Satanic feminism: Lucifer as the liberator of woman in nineteenth-century culture. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190664473.001.0001
Faxneld, P., & Petersen, J. A. (Eds.). (2013). The devil’s party: Satanism in modernity. Oxford University Press.
Goodrick-Clarke, N. (2002). Black sun: Aryan cults, esoteric Nazism and the politics of identity. New York University Press.
Hutton, R. (1999). The triumph of the moon: A history of modern pagan witchcraft. Oxford University Press.
Introvigne, M. (2016). Satanism: A social history. Brill.
Jung, C. G. (1968). The archetypes and the collective unconscious (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
LaVey, A. S. (1969). The Satanic Bible. Avon Books.
Levack, B. P. (2016). The witch-hunt in early modern Europe (4th ed.). Routledge.
Mikhaylova, O. R. (2022). A struggle for definition: explanatory models of satanism in sociology. In Social Sciences, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00400-0
Nathan, D., & Snedeker, M. (1995). Satan’s silence: Ritual abuse and the making of a modern American witch hunt. Basic Books.
Nickelsburg, G. W. E., & VanderKam, J. C. (2012). 1 Enoch: A new translation. Fortress Press.
Peterson, J. H. (Ed.). (2001). The lesser key of Solomon: Lemegeton clavicula Salomonis. Weiser Books.
Pinch, G. (2002). Handbook of Egyptian mythology. ABC-CLIO.
Plato. (1997). Symposium (A. Nehamas & P. Woodruff, Trans.). In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Plato: Complete works (pp. 457–505). Hackett Publishing Company.
Reed, A. Y. (2005). Fallen angels and the history of Judaism and Christianity: The reception of Enochic literature. Cambridge University Press.
Victor, J. S. (1993). Satanic panic: The creation of a contemporary legend. Open Court.
Leave a Reply